Posted by
Brian Du Bois on Tuesday, July 22, 2008 3:21:43 AM
This year the debate over gay marriage comes to a head in the State of California. Although the people of California have already decided by an over whelming majority that marriage is defined as one man and one woman joined together, there was once again a court that decided that they would legislate from the bench and override the will of the people.
In November, once again the people of California will decided the definition of marriage. This vote is being closely followed by most groups of interest across the nation. Both sides are going full force into what many believe will be this countries most expensive state ballot measure ever.
The question that neither side seems to be asking is why is the government involved in this debate at all. As promised when I stated this blog, the most complicated issues facing this nation would be solved in the simplest of ways. This debate can be solved with five simple words: SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE.
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
For many years this was debated. But it was not until 1947 that this debate was for most solved by the Supreme Court. In the case of Everson v. Board of Education, Justice Hugo Black clearly defined that there must be a wall between church and state. It should be noted that one of the most powerful decision to come from the Supreme Court was written by an ex Ku Klux Klan member.
In the decades since Justice Black wrote his decision the wall has been moved several times. It is the opinion of this author that it has moved in the wrong direction. From prayer in schools, to the words Under God in our pledge there are those who would like to remove God from every aspect of the public circle. It must be noted that in doing so we are turning our back on the founding principals and core beliefs that this great nation was built on. But that is a topic for another day.
So you might now be asking what separation of church and state has to do with gay marriage in this country. It is simple.
In Genesis we find the following:
Genesis 2:18, 21-24: The Lord God said, 'It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him'...and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man's ribs and closed up the place with flesh.
Then the Lord God made a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man. The man said, 'This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called 'woman,' for she was taken out of man.' For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh. (NIV)
In the beginning God created the havens and the earth and as we can tell from the above passage of scripture, God created marriage.
This is clearly the first record of marriage in the history of mankind. Weather you agree with it or not, this definition clearly defines marriage as the unity of one man and one woman into one flesh.
The institution of marriage itself is one of a religious and biblical nature to begin with. There was a time when a man and a woman would stand in front of God and family and profess their commitment to each other. In the eyes of many including our government, as long as this was done with the oversight of a recognized man of God it was legal and binding. At some point with the justification of the public welfare, the government stated to regulate marriage. With the thought of disease control, the census and to make sure that the parties involved could legally enter into a marriage the government started to require that one be licensed by the state in order to enter this biblical union. Of course as with all things government there was a fee involved.
If the government can argue that a bible in the classroom of John Freshwater in Columbus Ohio is a violation of church and state then clearly we can argue that the government has no right to violate its own rules and jump the wall that they themselves have so forceful erected.
I am not a proponent of the separation of church and state, but if the government is going to establish law then they should be forced to abide by it. Government has no right to redefine that that is clearly a religious institution.
A simple solution to a complicated problem, it only took five words.